personally, I think the rating system is really really really strict and unfair. For example - Troy and matrix revolutions. There is violence, but so is there in life. I am sure no one, after Troy, took a spear and aimed at people's heels, nor did anyone after the matrix pretend he is the one and try to stop bullets. Teen violence surely doesn't come from these movies. I also do not understand why nudity should be taken as a factor for a high rating. Sex scenes, I understand, but you see yourself naked every day!
I have a netflix subscription, and almost all of the films we rent happen to be rated R. Not because we like seeing violence and nudity, but because most good movies contain those, and there they are not to prevent us from watching good movies. My parents watch with me, and they don't really care. At least in my family, we do not learn from movies, but take them as they are - fiction.
Overall the rating system is good! It tells the potential viewers what they may expect from a movie. If the rating is taken into consideration, that is a different matter . The ticket seller is encouraged to sell more not to keep the kids out. Did you ever heard of sanctions given to someone that let children into a cinema with a R rated movie?
Message Edited! Persephone: Message edited, substituted 'ratted' for 'rated' 3 times. |
I believe the rating system has become too lenient to be helpful. Look at old movies rated R, then look at what now passes for PG-13 or even PG. For example, Hitchcock's 'Psycho' is frightening, but even the shower scene is quite tame in comparison to some of today's PG-13 movies. I have actually only seen that clip from Psycho - I have never seen an 'R' movie unless it was edited for TV. I will especially avoid the 'R' movies that are coming out today, because films must contain some fairly offensive material to receive that rating these days.
We need a new rating system with more classifications, and all movies need to be re-rated objectively on the new scale. A good model might be the TV ratings, because along with the rating comes a code for what justified that rating. For example, a show rated TV-M LSV is intended for mature audiences and contains bad language, sexuality, and violence. For me, that means I should probably make a different choice. More specific ratings would help families avoid movies that look good on the box, but turn out quite vulgar while the children are watching.
One of my friends worked for a national video store chain. He said, "Our drama section is mostly soft porn." Yet most of the videos had PG-13 ratings or better. I cannot trust the movie ratings system. I do my homework before going to the theater, because there are some things I just don't want to see or support.
QUOTE |
I believe the rating system has become too lenient to be helpful |
QUOTE (howe6079 @ 5-Jan 05, 5:28 AM) |
I believe the rating system has become too lenient to be helpful. Look at old movies rated R, then look at what now passes for PG-13 or even PG. [...] I will especially avoid the 'R' movies that are coming out today, because films must contain some fairly offensive material to receive that rating these days. [...] I cannot trust the movie ratings system. I do my homework before going to the theater, because there are some things I just don't want to see or support. |
QUOTE |
I think the major difference between Hitchcock and most of today's movies is that Hitchcock showed scenes that may inspire the viewer to act. For example, the serial killer whitch stabs his prey, etc. Today, however, most violent movies are fantasy or sciece fiction or something related. What I mean by that is - fights of armies against each other, kong fu, races, etc. that kind of violence has less chances of inspiring the viewer's to act violent than Hitchcock's. |
QUOTE |
So, I think we need a better rating system |