EW has rated Harry Potter as entertainer of decade, first out of hundred other, ( Lord of the Rings including, no kidding).
What, they surveyed 16 year olds? Teenage magician beat Jack Sparrow? come on...
All I saw ( or tried to see) of Harry Potter movies was the first one. Me and my friend were watching it and he suggested watching the film in 64x (Highest fast forward speed in DVD Player, that time).
If I tried or forced to see any other Harry Potter movie, very well I would have snoozed through them.
Is magazine editors/survey people are trying to show they are "hip" by coming at this conclusion?
There are some hardcore Potter fans that will rate the books and movies as numero uno no matter where they are. I don't see it being that special. The Twlight series is way more entertaining.