I still think that there is not much scriptural support for you ideas. I do accept that God did not "make" Satan a tempter. It was on his own admission. But also lets realize something... Satan is a liar, so his words in the temple need to be put in that light.
I think that we do know why Satan rebelled. He uses the same argument that he always has, the same argument he told Adam and Eve.
He felt that God was holding back from him, that he could become god without God's help. He wanted to rival God and take his place. That is what he is telling eve in genesis. That god is lying to you, that is why he does not want you to eat the fruit. Because if you do you will be as god knowing good and evil. In other words you will not need God because you will be like him. This is the temptation of Satan, to be a god unto himself. So in a half-truth way he is doing what already has been done before.
But the interesting thing is what genesis says about death and knowledge of good and evil. It is not coincidence that the first death in the Bible in the next very chapter is a murder. We see right off the bat what "knowledge independent of god" brings. We see what kind of death comes from eating the forbidden truth.
This is the why the natural man becomes an enemy to God. One who is proud and sees himself independent of god with a false since of knowledge. If we really knew good and evil like god, then why does man struggle with so many moral issues? Why then is divine truth only accessed through revelation? We as man have bought into Satan's ideas here on earth. The very ideas that we rejected in the pre-mortal existence. Thus there is a need for an atonement.
Name: Arizona LDS
Comments: best way I can explain it to you in a nutshell is to see the war in heaven as one event but the Adam and Eve scenario as a multiple event. You're right that the scriptures don't specify, but then again the scriptures don't specify a lot of things. That's why it's nice to have modern revelation.
Name: Detec
Comments: Why did Lucifer attempt an overthrow? Well someone had to start somewhere. Maybe he was asked to do it as a test. I think there is a lot more to it than what we know.
Name: TruthDefender
Country:
Comments: On the scriptures in Alma 42, it is important to see the structure it was written in. There is a chiasmus between verses 22 and 23. The first poster only quoted verse 22. For more study on chiasmus read John Tvetness work. If you are not familiar, study up on it. I do not have the time to explain it all. But, I have broken it down into the chiasmus form for you. Each Letter has a corresponding Letter. A matches A as the pattern progresses to the climax of G. G matches G. These corresponding letters show corresponding ideas. The climax marking the most significant idea of the chiasmus.