Burial Site Vs. Water Project

Burial Site Vs Water Project - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 24th Jun, 2010 - 1:16am

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

Posts: 3 - Views: 714
Post Date: 18th Jun, 2010 - 6:17pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Burial Site Vs. Water Project

Burial site vs. Water project

A state commission voted Thursday to recognize a Lakeside parcel as an Indian burial site, in an attempt to protect it from being part of a $20 million water project. Ref. Source 9

Sponsored Links:
18th Jun, 2010 - 8:50pm / Post ID: #

Project Water Vs Site Burial

I think that sacred Indian burial sites should be left alone, regardless of what use could be made of the land!
I agree that the right decision was made to protect this area, it's a shame that this isn't made the same nationally!


International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 29 ActivistPoliticianActivist 2.9%


24th Jun, 2010 - 1:16am / Post ID: #

Burial Site Vs. Water Project History & Civil Business Politics

I notice that it is a common habit of men in general to think that because something is unmarked that it can be claimed by anyone.


International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3232 ActivistPoliticianInternational Guru 100%



 
> TOPIC: Burial Site Vs. Water Project
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,