QUOTE |
Although one has the legal right in the US to practice whatever religion they choose and my particular religion has as one of it's articles of faith that we also believe others to have this right as a matter of our religious belief, people outside of the courtroom do not always act in accordance with the spirit (or even the letter) of the law. What I mean by this is that just because the law says one can't discriminate doesn't mean it won't be done, it just means if you can prove it was done there will be a legal remedy given you. |
Rox4brains, I don't understand the meaning or relevance to your post. Could you please explain it to me?
In addition, to whom are you referring when you say "my dear."
Now, since this post is about discrimination, what difference does it make if a religion is "legit" or not? I don't think that is what we are discussing here. (if you haven't already, you might want to read the first post)The question is more about how it is that they can be discriminated against. At least that is what I have gotten from this thread.
Even so called "legit" religions get discriminated against. So whether they are legit or not changes nothing, in my opinion. People still will make judgments on their own about what they consider a valid religion or not. This doesn't make it right, but I think it does happen.
QUOTE |
If this group purchases their own building then I don't think there is any reasonable explanation for preventing them from practicing their beliefs in it,.... |
QUOTE |
But if the area they want to meet in isn't zoned for churches then it wouldn't matter what religion they were. Â These laws look into parking and available road use to handle the expected traffic. Â It's all mudane but it does affect the neighborhood. Â And many organizations are facing zoning issues not just churches. |