This question is really pointless. No revelations have been given on the matter, and probably never will. The subject is much to sacred for God to reveal these "pearls" to man, as long as there is so much iniquity. And what does it matter to my eternal salvation if Christ was married or not. It has nothing to do with it.
Of course he was married and most likely had multiple wives.
He came to fulfill the whole law. That included marriage, kids and probably polygamy. We know from the early brethren that Adam had multiple wives. George Q.Cannon (First Presidency) stated that there were members in the audience that were direct disendants of the Lord Jesus Christ. That means he had kids. The prophet then stood up and testified to the truth of what Pres. Cannon just had declared. So there is no question about it. If there is no marriage in heaven, why would we think the Lord would be exempt from this super important commandment to go and multiply the earth. That was not just for Adam but for all of us including our Lord. It is accepted in many circles that Jesus was married to Mary, Martha, Elizabeth and Mary Magdalene. Can you imagine martha complaining to an "outsider" about Mary not pulling her weight in the chores. In those days. It would be totally wrong, unless he was their husband. It was totally unacceptable for a man to be in a house with women unless being the husband. Cornelius Celsus wrote a letter complaining about the many wives Jesus had? If it is an eternal principal then he was married and maybe just maybe had multiple wives as well.
Excellent post, Robert! I have to say you hit it right on the nail. Many scholars know that Jesus had to be married to the women He had in His company, or it would have caused so much upheaval in the society of that day. Jesus came to show us the way. He would have proven Himself a transgressor if He had not entered into the everlasting covenant marriage. There is no probability in it, Jesus had many wives, and this will be proven when He comes again in all His glory. Remember, you can't be a God without a women by your side.
I agree that it is likely that he was married but the whole rest of who he married to and how many wives he had is pure speculation folks. There is NO WAY we can KNOW (For a FACT) who he married and whether he had many wives or not.
Well, actually, Miss Happy_LDS, there is a way we can know? Do you know what a seer is?
So basically you're saying that everything a Prophet states in General Conference is revelation/doctrine. I don't necessarily agree with that. Many things have been said in the past in General Conference with regards to politics (Does Pres. Benson's talks sound familiar?) as an example that I personally do not see it as a revelation (That's just one of several examples). It has nothing to do with being strong or being weak. It's a matter of discerning whether the prophet is speaking his opinion or given a revelation no matter the platform.
According to the Doctrine and Covenants, if the Lord has any new doctrine to reveal to the Church He will do so through the President of the Church and no one else, including even any of the apostles. Thus, if anyone, including even an apostle of the Lord, preaches something that has never been taught by the President of the Church, then that person is essentially usurping the authority of the President of the Church and is not inspired by the Holy Ghost, regardless of whether or not they are speaking in General Conference.
According to Harold B. Lee, if the President of the Church does have new doctrine to announce to the Church, then he will announce it as new revelation. The paradigm here is the revelation on Priesthood, which was announced as a new revelation from the Lord.
Since no President of the Church has ever announced a new revelation to the effect that Jesus practiced polygamy it necessarily follows that anything that anyone has said on that subject is nothing more than their own opinion, which may or may not be true.