I was recently asked this question, and I answered based on my logical thoughts, but I thought I would put it here for discussion:
In the Book of Mormon we understand that the Lamanites was given a curse of dark skin:
QUOTE (2 Nephi 5:21) |
And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them. |
QUOTE (3 Nephi 2:14-16) |
And it came to pass that those Lamanites who had united with the Nephites were numbered among the Nephites; And their curse was taken from them, and their skin became white like unto the Nephites; And their young men and their daughters became exceedingly fair, and they were numbered among the Nephites, and were called Nephites. And thus ended the thirteenth year. |
I assume it was the same process, or rather the reverse process to change their skin back to white. Whatever that process is. Or maybe it was not a change in the actual color of their skin at all. Maybe the curse of darkened skin is symbolic and not actual. Maybe it was a spiritual darkness, a change in their countenance from light and full of the spirit to a dark or unholy countenance. Take a look at a general authority, an apostle or Pres. Hinckley. You can see the light of Christ in their countenance. Now take a look at a drug addict living on the streets. He may be as white as the Prophet as far as skin color but his countenance is very dark.
QUOTE |
Or maybe it was not a change in the actual color of their skin at all. Maybe the curse of darkened skin is symbolic and not actual. Maybe it was a spiritual darkness, a change in their countenance from light and full of the spirit to a dark or unholy countenance. Take a look at a general authority, an apostle or Pres. Hinckley. You can see the light of Christ in their countenance. |
Well, one thing is possible referring to how their children became exceedingly white. Once the Lamanites united with the Nephites and were counted among their number they would have intermarried. This would have caused each generation of children to become lighter in skin coloring. This doesn't explain how the first generation Lamanites may have had their skin lightened, but it might explain why the children were even lighter.
Edited: tenaheff on 13th Sep, 2004 - 9:00pm
Now some members assume that Joseph Smith in the translation of the Book of Mormon did not mean to say 'white and delightsome' but 'Pure and delightsome', but in countless places in the Book of Mormon it clearly states the word 'white', so the question would be why in certain parts the word 'white' was removed and in other parts was not removed? any thoughts?.
QUOTE (JB@Trinidad @ 16-Jul 04, 5:53 AM) |
I was recently asked this question, and I answered based on my logical thoughts, but I thought I would put it here for discussion: In the Book of Mormon we understand that the Lamanites was given a curse of dark skin: Now later we read that for some of the Lamanites this dark skin was removed. The question is... how did their skin become white again? Was it the same process in which it became dark? |
Message Edited! It is not necessary or desirable to quote someone's entire post. When you use the quote feature, there is a small window below the main edit window, where you can pick and choose what part of the message you wish to quote. |
I think the reason why they had to have something physical changed is because it had to be obvious who was part of their people and who wasn't. If the nephites were to associate with the lamanites when they (lamanites) weren't living righteously, the nephites would begin to fall as well. It was basically just a way of marking them, not saying that dark skin is bad, but it seperated them from the nephites (though it was unnatural at the time).