In Genesis 24:67 there is a mention of love for a woman (Rebekah) by Isaac, but in most instances it seemed as though the marriages were arranged.
24:67 And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death.
The question is... are marriages in olden days or traditionally based on love or arrangement? Is there such a thing as one being specifically sent to you for marriage in this life?
QUOTE |
The question is... are marriages in olden days or traditionally based on love or arrangement? |
[center] I'm Super Active [/center]
QUOTE |
The question is... are marriages in olden days or traditionally based on love or arrangement? Is there such a thing as one being specifically sent to you for marriage in this life? |
QUOTE |
" "Soul mates" are a fiction and an illusion; and while every young man and young woman will seek with all diligence and prayerfulness to find a mate with whom life can be most compatible and beautiful, yet it is certain that almost any good man and any good woman can have happiness and a successful marriage if both are willing to pay the price" ("Marriage and Divorce," p. 146). |
QUOTE |
"While I am sure some young couples have some special guidance in getting together, I do not believe in predestined love. If you desire the inspiration of the Lord in this crucial decision, you must live the standards of the Church, and you must pray constantly for the wisdom to recognize those qualities upon which a successful union may be based. You must do the choosing, rather than to seek for some one-and-only so-called soul mate, chosen for you by someone else and waiting for you. You are to do the choosing. You must be wise beyond your years and humbly prayerful unless you choose amiss" (Eternal Love [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1973], p. 11). |
I'm definitely not against marriage, however, I am against bad marriages. I know what works because I've experienced, first-hand, what doesn't work. I seriously double that in this day and age anyone would accept an arranged marriage as done ages ago. I also believe that traditional gender "roles" are no longer set in stone where two incomes are often necessary just to make ends meet and still provide decent lives and opportunities for the children, or in single parent families, or for women who have been blessed with special skills and given a special work to do outside the home, or as a result of increased educational and career opportunities for women. Some men still find this a bit disconcerting because they still place subconscious limitations on women to one degree or another.
A different form of "arranged" marriages does exist today. The match-making mother/friend/sibling/co-worker/boss who "arranges" a meeting or introduction that actually works out and leads to marriage. And what about those internet dating services that matches people up according to profiles listed. Okay, it's a bit of a stretch, but arranged or not, aren't you glad we have the final choice?
Good marriages require mutual effort, time, communication, patience, respect, a sense of humor, relatively thick skin, assertiveness, honor, integrity, healthy self-esteem, mutual esteem, love, romance, healthy chemistry, play time, and an occassional "time-out". Occassional arguments and fights have been known to occur, as well, without permanent injury to body, mind, heart, spirit, intellect, or relationship. I've known many couples who have been so blessed. Sounds complicated when put to paper, but simple when common sense is present. Under these circumstances, yes, it is possible to learn to love anyone in possession of these qualities. But there's the other side of the coin to consider.
Sorry, common sense is not so common anymore, and because everyone is not like the above description, it's not true that you can learn to love anyone. Nor can you "love someone into" becoming a decent person or mate. Someone who is abusive (physically OR mentally OR emotionally OR any other way -- and there are 14 different kinds of "abusive"), controlling, domineering, jealous, obsessive, possessive, greedy, self-absorbed, or cruel is not someone you can learn to love. Become dependent on, or victim to, yes.... love.... no. I've met men (and women) like that inside AND outside the church -- LDS men (and women) are not exempt from these characteristics -- and LDS women (and men) are not exempt from falling victim to such. True, these negative qualities are not taught by God, nor are LDS women (or anyone) expected to accept or tolerate these characteristics, however, you don't really know a person just by social demeanor, looks, dress, education, talent, skills, church position, or church activity. There are many who put up a good front until you get behind closed doors -- unless, of course, you know how to spot the red flags and warning signs. That, unfortunately often comes from personal experience, directly or indirectly. And worse, even the experienced and healed are sometimes fooled, but usually, not for long.
The problem today is that people don't WANT to WORK at making the marriage of their own choosing or any relationship successful. Some become complacent and quit making an effort. Some take their partner for granted. Some people are selfish and want to mold a person into the image of what they want them to be. Others are unwilling to make changes necessary within themselves, saying, "That's just the way I am." or "I'm not changing for anybody!" or it's "my way or the highway" or they expect it to be easy and problem-free, or they simply don't believe they have any faults. Still others have unreasonable expectations of their mate or intended mate. And some want to control their mates or intended mates rather than delighting in their differences and uniqueness and divine qualities and talents. Some are abusive in some way and to varying degrees toward their partner. The lucky escape this situation by choosing not to marry in the first place, or divorce when the pain of staying becomes greater than the fear of leaving. The unlucky either don't escape and suffer, or die at the hand of their abusive partner. From personal experience, I sadly find too many older single/divorced LDS males as well as too many older single/divorced men outside the church possessed of one or more of these negative traits. I dare say that this is true of some women, too. I've even met single LDS men who were so pre-occupied with the idea of plural marriage in the eternities, yet don't make an effort to be worthy of one good woman here on earth!
Single sisters, especially we older single sisters, those of us who have experienced divorce as a result of emotional or physical abuse or other intolerable situations (infidelity, gambling, substance abuse, financial irresponsibility, criminal behavior, child abuse, etc.), and those who are blessed with an abundance of talent, skills, intelligence, and strength, find it increasingly difficult to find older single/divorced men in the church, or out of the church who are not intimidated by those qualities in a woman. There are more women than men in the church, so ratio also works against us.
But guess what? I still believe in marriage, because we were not created to be alone. If we were, there would be no such thing as loneliness.
QUOTE |
The problem today is that people don't WANT to WORK at making the marriage of their own choosing or any relationship successful. Some become complacent and quit making an effort. |
QUOTE |
Single sisters, especially we older single sisters, those of us who have experienced divorce as a result of emotional or physical abuse or other intolerable situations (infidelity, gambling, substance abuse, financial irresponsibility, criminal behavior, child abuse, etc.), and those who are blessed with an abundance of talent, skills, intelligence, and strength, find it increasingly difficult to find older single/divorced men in the church, or out of the church who are not intimidated by those qualities in a woman. There are more women than men in the church, so ratio also works against us. But guess what? I still believe in marriage, because we were not created to be alone. If we were, there would be no such thing as loneliness. |
QUOTE |
I've even met single LDS men who were so pre-occupied with the idea of plural marriage in the eternities, yet don't make an effort to be worthy of one good woman here on earth |
c7sparks -- I so agree with the majority of your post! (and awesome writing, besides, thank you!) The "male situation" in the singles church activities is pretty pathetic, to put it mildly.
I would like to comment on these thoughts:
QUOTE |
I seriously double that in this day and age anyone would accept an arranged marriage as done ages ago. |
QUOTE |
I also believe that traditional gender "roles" are no longer set in stone where two incomes are often necessary just to make ends meet and still provide decent lives and opportunities for the children, or in single parent families, or for women who have been blessed with special skills and given a special work to do outside the home, or as a result of increased educational and career opportunities for women. Some men still find this a bit disconcerting because they still place subconscious limitations on women to one degree or another. |