![>](style_images/Executiv-909/nav_m.gif)
QUOTE (JB@Trinidad @ 29-Feb 04, 10:43 AM) |
There are just those who need to have a 'letter of the law', because they cannot think for themselves. |
QUOTE |
we should be getting all the guidance we are capable of from the Holy Ghos |
Wow, excelent points guys. I gave a charisma point to each one of you (JB and Nighhawlk) I loved the way you all express your ideas about it...I just wish I could speak english as well as you all do
QUOTE |
He made Braveheart, which contains elements of nobility, personal sacrifice, and freedom - all as ideals. Yes, it was rated R, it was violent, graphic, and intense. He made The Patriot, again extremely graphic and intense. And in it, his character gave his sons guns with which to fight the enemy. Again, elements of intense personal sacrifice, freedom, liberty, and true nobility. How about Ransom, with its message of NOT giving in to a criminal, and even eventually finding out who the criminal was, (without the dubious help of the police), and beating the snot out of the man who harmed his son? Shall we say it again? Personal sacrifice, personal responsibility, liberty, nobility.l |
LDS, you bring up some excellent points. Another way to look at some of these movies is the purpose of the movie.
The Passion of the Christ is a work of art, lovingly made as an act of worship. Just as many of the masterpiece paintings in museums around the world portray violence, nudity, perhaps even intense sexuality, doesn't mean that we reject them all out of hand. We judge each on its own merits.
There is a huge difference between movies as works of art (as opposed to artsy movies), and such things as, say, Friday the 13th or Striptease. I don't think it takes much thought to dismiss the latter types of movies.
NightHawk
Thanks. Look at the movie 'Anger Management' for instance, its rated PG 13 "Crude sexual content and language" now because is not an R-rated movie, that's it mean, I have the 'okay' to go and see this movie?. I haven't personally see it but I heard a couple of members talking about it some time ago and saying they're were surprised how they show two women kissing just so!,
Now we have no problem to see a movie like that but yes we don't want to go and see a movie about the suffering of Christ on the cross!. You know what I mean?. I'm not trying to judge anybody but I want to say is that we need to pay a close look at the content of the movie and not always the ratings, some R-rated movies (maybe like the Passion) is for kindergarden children compared to some PG or PG 13 movies! (a lot of sexual content and swearing!) but that's okay because is not rated R? It doesn't make much sense to me.
Some LDS parents do not see anything wrong in allowing their children to see this Harry Potter guy, he is a wizard, a sorcerer!...okay...it's just a movie, fine with me, but we know as LDS members what is our position about all that stuff, even little children wants to dress and act like Harry Potter! and is a 'family' movie...now you have a movie about Christ and because the movie gives a lot of emphasis on the suffering of Christ, is not good to watch?.
Here is an interesting article on R rated movies. Sorry if it has been posted before, I didnt read all the replies.
https://www.sunstoneonline.com/magazine/iss...e%20ratings.pdf
Very interesting article. Makes me see I need to perhaps reevaluate my position on R rated movies.
BTW-After much consideration, I bought my tickets on-line today to see Passion tomorrow night.