If people don't mind that story that Wanlorn told reminded me of another one.
One day a guy was dreaming, and he enters into this vault full of Card Catalog holders. He opened one and it was a sin that he had done years before. Curious he opened another one and it was a more recent sin.
Then a man walked in the room and told him that he needed to take responsibility for all of his actions. Looking around he was amazed at how many was there.
He started signing them when another man came in and asked to see his card. Out of curiosity he handed that to the man. Then he asked for his pen, he handed him his pen. He started to sign his name to it, the man noticed the signature it was Jesus Christ. The man in awe looked at him, in reply Jesus said, I will take your place that you don't have to suffer.
This may not be how it was originally told but it carries the same message.
There is another story, that for me, better portrays the atonement. It is also true!
During the Civil War, there was a young soldier that fell asleep at his post and his platoon was killed. The proper punishment for dereliction of duty was death and no one argued against that. However, this young man's mother wrote to Pres. Lincoln telling him that her husband and all here other sons had served and died in the war and that if her last son was executed, she would have no one to provide for her in her old age.
Pres. Lincoln pardoned the young man and now one objected. Mercy had overcome Justice - or Justice had been appeased.
Alma 34:11 says that no man can pay for the sins of another - Isn't Christ a man!?!?
Alma 42:15, 16 says that the atonement's purpose was to appease the demands of Justice - not to meet the demands of justice but to appease.
The purpose of the Atonement was/is to invoke mercy so justice would be appeased.
The problem with Skousen's idea is that Christ appeases justice. But what he fails to answer is how then does that change me? It may appease justice but I may not be personally changed. I feel that there is a changing power in the atonement it is a relationship with deity which changes oneself, not a contract to just appease sin.
He focuses on the appeasement of justice with the intelligences, but deals very little with how it transforms my life. He then also states that this appeasement is only done if I am accepted by Christ or found "worthy" by him. Therefore I went form one creditor to another. This has its problems.
I also do not think like (Skousen thinks) that one steps in place of another. This is not justice at all. No one steps in my place for my sins. I do not think that this is necessary for forgiveness.
QUOTE (Alma 42:5) |
And now, the plan of mercy could not be brought about except an atonement should be made; therefore God himself atoneth for the sins of the world, to bring about the plan of mercy, to appease the demands of justice, that God might be a perfect, just God, and a merciful God also. |
Message Edited... Persephone: Please look at how we use the Quote Tags here. When you do not use these tags source material that is not your own may appear to be yours when it is not. See our Constructive Posting Policy. |