I don't think it should be a rule unless the prophet says the Lord told him to make it a rule. To me, it isn't good enough that the prophet thinks it a good idea.
I was a Temple worker just after the Boston Temple opened in October 2000. This clean shaven rule was newly in affect at that time. It was explained to us that the reason for it was that no one should feel offended or fearful while in the Temple and a Temple worker with a beard might intimidate a patron. This rule also forbade mustaches.
If that is the reasoning, it doesn't make sense. If you are a patron, then you surely understand the type of life any Temple worker must be living in order to hold a Temple recommend and to be called as a worker. So, I don't see why you would be intimidated by the presence of a beard. This is a poor stereotype that has no place in society and certainly doesn't belong in the Temple.
I know one member who chose to be released and even for a while refused to attend the Boston Temple. He had been a worker at the DC Temple and so thought this was a rule only for Boston. I don't know if he has gone back to attending the Temple or not.
Now, I think it is foolish for anyone to stop attending the Temple because of a facial hair requirement for workers. You may choose not to be a worker, but why would you give up the blessings of Temple attendance.
While I don't agree with the policy, I would not allow it to deprive me of the opportunity of Temple attendance. I don't care if they changed some standard for me and said, all motorcyle riders need to turn in their Temple recommends or give up the bikes. I would give up the bike. I would be resentful, but I would also be obedient not because I agree with the rule, but simply because attending the Temple is far more important to me than riding a motorcycle. I would hope this would be true for men and facial hair.
Edited: tenaheff on 29th Dec, 2004 - 4:58pm
Well, I think obedience comes first. Then maybe if I became convinced that it was what the Lord required of me and not just some man with preconceived, unfair judgments, then I would not be resentful.
Sometimes we need to obey before we learn the truthfulness of a principal.
QUOTE |
It was explained to us that the reason for it was that no one should feel offended or fearful while in the Temple and a Temple worker with a beard might intimidate a patron. This rule also forbade mustaches. If that is the reasoning, it doesn't make sense. If you are a patron, then you surely understand the type of life any Temple worker must be living in order to hold a Temple recommend and to be called as a worker. So, I don't see why you would be intimidated by the presence of a beard. This is a poor stereotype that has no place in society and certainly doesn't belong in the Temple. |
QUOTE (JB@Trinidad @ 29-Dec 03, 12:54 PM) |
Can one be resentful and still be doing the right thing though? |
QUOTE |
This is one of my greatest concerns about the direction that the church has taken. It is not a matter of doctrine, or of following the prophet, or any similar thing. It is the fact that rules and policies have been put in place, purely as a matter of "image"! |
QUOTE (LDS_forever @ 5-Jan 04, 12:02 PM) |
But NO rules or policies are WITHOUT the consent of the First Presidency. |
QUOTE |
I'm hoping that this "clean shaven" temple worker thing is something like this. |