![Mormon Beliefs About Dinosaurs Mormon Beliefs About Dinosaurs](/board/YaBBImages/icons/pencil.gif)
I understand what you're saying but really it doesn't matter whether these people know how a dinosaur looks like or not, what I'm saying is that stories like that are everywhere, specially in places like Papua New Guinea, by the way, have you seen the fauna of that country? my goodness, the most weird animals I have ever seen in a documental on TV were found in there. That's why I'm not surprised of the story itself, I know how islanders are and their stories and as I said before I am also aware of how wide the animal kingdom is. But from there to assure that dinosaurs exist there is a HUGE difference. In Argentina for instance there is a very famous lake in the South where people swear have seen a HUGE beast swimming, they even capture some 'pictures'. If you see the pics, you cannot really see much. This story of the dinosaur in Papua New Guinea is not much difference from the story of Big Foot. People swear seeing Big Foot and describe it to perfection! have anybody captured him? or took a picture?.
Virtually every major lake on Earth has had sightings of lake monsters, creatures that for all intents and purposes appear to be plesiosaurs. Nahuelito, named after Nahuel Huapi Lake in Argentina where the creature has been sighted, is the thing you are referring to. The problem is that both tourists and locals see these things. Are to the tourists superstitious, too?
Some lake monsters are captured on camera and film, but most are only seen for moments or minutes and then duck below the surface again. Usually the pictures are not very good, as you've pointed out. However, as Latter-day Saints, we are taught that there is a law of witnesses. That in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall all things be established. (Not in the clear and detailed photographic evidence of two or three photographers, mind you, but in their word.) We have a Testimony of Three Witnesses that claims to have seen an angel come down with a table full of plates and other items, but we easily accept that. What is more fantastic, though? -- Hundreds of tourists and natives around the world at these lakes who year by year accumulate a body of testimony that plesiosaurs are seen in these lakes, or three Americans who say they were shown some plates by an angel, plates that are forbidden to be seen by anyone else?
Which is the harder to believe?
If it were any other animal shape, say a horse-like creature, or anything that appeared to be similar to modern mammals, although we didn't have a specimen, we'd say, well, there is something out there that has until now remained elusive but the body of witnesses attests that it exists and hopefully one day we'll capture the thing. The problem, though, is that all the descriptions fit only one thing: a plesiosaur, which is supposed to be extinct. So modern man, and Latter-day Saint man who has been schooled by modern man, says, it can't be that, they must all be delusional.
Anything that contradicts our revealed gospel knowledge we can readily discount, such as the account you mentioned of people turning into animals and then back again. But sightings and descriptions of animals (dinosaurs) that are supposed to be extinct is entirely within the realm of possibility. Our dating of the dinosaurs comes from the scientists. Do we really believe that this dating is correct?
The living coelacanth that was found back in 1938 ought to have taught us all a lesson about scientific "facts." This fish was supposed to have become extinct 65 million years ago! We Latter-day Saints are the first to exclaim that the Lord is able to lead His children away from the general populace from time to time and hide them from everyone else for long periods of time, but we choke when considering that He can do the same with an entire species of animals. Do not the scriptures say that all things bear witness of Him, both on, in and under the Earth? We live on the Earth, but have we never thought of in and under the Earth?
When the dinosaurs are again allowed by the Lord to come out of their hiding places, they also will bear witness to the power of the Creator, just as Job says about Behemoth, "the chief of the ways of God."
QUOTE |
Nahuelito, named after Nahuel Huapi Lake in Argentina where the creature has been sighted, is the thing you are referring to. The problem is that both tourists and locals see these things. Are to the tourists superstitious, too? |
QUOTE |
We have a Testimony of Three Witnesses that claims to have seen an angel come down with a table full of plates and other items, but we easily accept that. What is more fantastic, though? -- Hundreds of tourists and natives around the world at these lakes who year by year accumulate a body of testimony that plesiosaurs are seen in these lakes, or three Americans who say they were shown some plates by an angel, plates that are forbidden to be seen by anyone else? |
I believe that dinosaurs were used as fossil fuel to create the earth most likely or that the scientists have incorrectly assumed how long ago they were here. They claim dinosaurs occupied the earth BEFORE humans and that humans and dinosaurs never co-existed. My scriptures tell me there was no death on the earth before the fall in the garden of eden. So, how could dinosaurs have been here as a part of THIS earthly creation and died before the fall?
This thought process is not original to me. I got it from Book of Mormon Answerman and have just summarized it here. https://www.new-jerusalem.com/CLASSICS/BOMA/ Edited: tenaheff on 1st Apr, 2004 - 11:17pm
QUOTE (tenaheff @ 1-Apr 04, 11:17 PM) |
I believe that...the scientists have incorrectly assumed how long ago they were here. They claim dinosaurs occupied the earth BEFORE humans and that humans and dinosaurs never co-existed. My scriptures tell me there was no death on the earth before the fall in the garden of eden. So, how could dinosaurs have been here as a part of THIS earthly creation and died before the fall? |
QUOTE |
I believe that dinosaurs were used as fossil fuel to create the earth most likely or that the scientists have incorrectly assumed how long ago they were here. They claim dinosaurs occupied the earth BEFORE humans and that humans and dinosaurs never co-existed. My scriptures tell me there was no death on the earth before the fall in the garden of eden. So, how could dinosaurs have been here as a part of THIS earthly creation and died before the fall? |
I am tempted to use FRENCH and just say afterwards, "Pardon my French," but this is an LDS forum so I'll try to keep it less frank than it should be.
I don't know who wrote that article, but whoever he is, he doesn't know his scriptures, or doesn't believe them when he reads them, or doesn't care what they say because he'll interpret them and wrest them however he wants. The record is clear. No death before the Fall. The lengths in which some of us LDS go to harmonize the false doctrine of death before the fall with what the scriptures say is amazing to me. Must we fall in step to Babylon? Must we seek their approval?
The man's attempt to explain away the Fall's implications is banking on the inexperience and lack of knowledge of the general membership of the LDS Church. That he succeeds to a greater or lesser degree is both instructive of the state of the church and is frightening. He obviously knows that most members have never studied carbon dating techniques. They don't know the various ways of dating dead things. They don't know that there are variables which throw the dating off to the bizarre degree in which they are at (millions and millions of years off.) We LDS just blindly accept that the scientists are accurate in their false assessment (which has no basis in the scientific method) that these creatures have been dead for so very long. Then, in our mental laziness and laziness to search out the facts, we instead go to the scriptures and ignore what they are saying, take other parts out of context and voila!, science and religion now are harmonized and we are pals with Babylon again.
LDS, before quoting to us that article, you should have looked up the scriptures the writer referenced. A quick look would have quickly shown the man was taking the quotes out of context.
QUOTE |
But what does the scripture mean, "nevertheless, all things were before created"? [Moses 3:7] It sounds contradictory. What I am now suggesting, is that the bodies for man and other living things were indeed created or organized from the dust of the earth over eons of time before Adam, but that independent spirits were not placed into the bodies until Adam. |
Buggeyes, I could reply to your thread once again but it seems we are changing the subject of this thread plus it seems to me that we are not going to agree on this one. Sorry, but you talk like you are the owner of the Truth and really your theory is just one more, you cannot know for sure the things you have implied on this thread. Just the thought or belief that dinosaurs exist nowdays sounds completly insane in my humble opinion. You haven't make any mention of what I said about these animals have been created from matters from other planets, would justify the scientists theories on how long these animals lived on this Earth. Anyhow, I will not go further in this topic, I already explained my position and my personal thoughts. I respect yours even though I don't agree with it.