It is too bad that so many have been so thoroughly indoctrinated in the selfish attitudes of Babylon/Rome.
Here are a few links that discuss, in detail, Christian (not Mormon) polygamy.
https://www.lovenotforce.com/
https://www.pro-polygamy.com/
https://www.nccg.org/fecpp/CPM-HP-Index.html
Plural marriages, or polygamy, can be completely successful, if all the members are committed to overcoming their petty jealousies.
Actually, polygamy is the historical norm, strict monogamous marriages are the abnormal. That is even true within the world today, everywhere outside Christianity that descends from Rome.
NightHawk
QUOTE |
It is too bad that so many have been so thoroughly indoctrinated in the selfish attitudes of Babylon/Rome. |
QUOTE |
Plural marriages, or polygamy, can be completely successful, if all the members are committed to overcoming their petty jealousies. |
QUOTE (LDS_forever @ 8-Dec 03, 9:54 PM) |
And what that is supposed to mean? :<!--emo&:)--><!--endemo--> and to who you're speaking to? |
QUOTE |
Strictly monogamous marriage descends only from Greek and Roman culture. Greek culture frowned on polygamy, and Rome required monogamy. And look how both descended into the worst forms of corruption, especially sexual corruption. |
QUOTE |
How can you learn to control your envy, your jealousy, your covetousness (coveting your spouse), and your selfishness if you refuse to consider the alternatives (not speaking of anyone in particular, the collective "you", including myself.) |
I think it's actually too late for the Western world to even consider polygamy. Unless something really drastic happens to the World at Large, anyway.
I think if the plural marriages were negotiated by the *women* rather than the men, there might be more of a chance for the relationships to work out. I have some really awesome women friends.
I can see myself interviewing for the job of Second Wife.
First Wife: "...and what are your qualifications?"
Applicant: "I'm industrious, generous, love kids and pets, I sew, am computer savvy, and I do windows...."
IMO
Roz
@Farseer, are you serious?. I have no problem whatsoever about being in a Plural Marriage, bur of course since I'm the first wife I should be entitled to choose the wives *giggles* (yeah, those poor lonely ladies 70 and over) ;D
Farseer, why do you think the men are so in control of this? I believe the first wife actually has a big say in what goes on.
POLYGAMIST FALLS SHORT IN NAMING CHILDREN
Polygamist John Daniel Kingston says he knows all his children, but in court Friday he could name only nine of the 13 he fathered with one wife.
https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...65048%2C00.html
The Kingston clan are just about the weirdest group you can find. It appears to really be a control thing with them to be involved in plural marriage. They are definitely the example of why polygamy should NOT be practiced.