LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat - Page 18 of 27

I have disavowed association with any political - Page 18 - Mormon Doctrine Studies - Posted: 27th Dec, 2008 - 5:03am

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

+  « First of 27 pgs.  14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  ...Latest (27) »
Posts: 211 - Views: 31003
 
?
Poll: I Think The Idea Of Being A Good LDS Democrat Is...
19
  Great! There are good policies in the Democratic party       44.19%
9
  Good, we all have the freedom to choose, it is not a sin       20.93%
3
  No Opinion - just leave the Members to do what they think is best       6.98%
12
  Nonsense - how can you support a party against LDS principles       27.91%
Total Votes: 43
Guests Cannot Vote - Join To Add Your Vote! 
Is it possible to vote for the Democrats and say you support LDS Standards? Should every member be a Republican? Can you be a good Mormon and a Democrat?
LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat Related Information to LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat
Post Date: 1st Dec, 2008 - 11:03am / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat - Page 18

The following Church leaders were known as declared Democrats: President James E. Faust, Elder Marlin K. Jensen, President Heber J. Grant, President Wilford Woodruff, Elder Hugh B. Brown, Elder B.H. Roberts, Elder Charles C. Rich, Elder Anthony R. Ivins, Elder N. Eldon Tanner, Orson F. Whitney, Franklin D. Richards, Moses Thatcher, Abraham H. Cannon, Stephen L. Richards, Melvin J. Ballard, Joseph F. Merrill, Charles W. Penrose, John Rex Winder, John Willard Young, Edward Stevenson, Charles H. Hart, Antoine Ridgeway Ivins, Jacob Gates, and Henry D. Moyle.

Sponsored Links:
1st Dec, 2008 - 3:27pm / Post ID: #

Democrat Mormon Democrat LDS

The polarity of the two main political parties has changed a lot in recent years. If these leaders were asked to show where their votes are being thrown now it would look completely different. Check what the Democratic National Platform was like in the 1950's and it would look like today's platform for the Republicans.



1st Dec, 2008 - 6:17pm / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat Studies Doctrine Mormon

Rather off topic, but...

QUOTE

dbackers this is dead on.


No, I was not arguing for increased education to stop murder, I was trying to argue that some things need to be outlawed in order to stop it (or at least to have a consequence). I was using satire to state that the argument for unfettered Abortion is as wrong an argument as not regulating the killing of other individuals (I was not putting them on an equal footing, though I feel that an elective abortion that was not the result of rape or incest is, in my opinion, the killing of an innocent person.). I am not arguing to decriminalize murder, but that it need to be criminalized and a stigma attached to it. A stigma should be attached to Elective Abortion as well.

In my opinion except in cases of Rape,incest or the Extreme health of the Mother that Abortion should be criminalized also. Anyway surveys of women aborting their babies indicate that 1% of them are doing so because of rape or incest. (Source: Forrest, J.D. & Torres, A. "Why Do Women Have Abortions?" Family Planning Perspectives). It is so small that the rates of abortions based on rape or incest to be negligable and should be separated from the vast majority of convenience abortions.

As to abortion, it is in my opinion, between sexual sins and murder(in that it is very serious but not on par with the unpardonable sin of murder.). The church considers elective abortions very serious and considers it an offence that may result in excommunication in many circumstances.

From the church handbook:
QUOTE

The Church opposes abortion as one of the most revolting and sinful practices of this day. Members must not submit to, be a party to, or perform an abortion. The only exceptions are the rare cases where, in the opinion of competent medical counsel, the life or health of the woman is in jeopardy or the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape. Even then, the woman should consider an abortion only after counseling with her husband and bishop or branch president, and receiving divine confirmation through prayer

It is a pretty serious offence, but is acceptable, with council under very rare circumstances.


But back to the point
I hate moral relativism, and Democrats seem to swim in it. I am not saying that Republicans are that much better, but to me Abortion is such a uniquely evil practice that denies life to individuals and is a cruel way to kill an unborn baby, that it is hard to maintain membership in such an organization(This is of course my personal opinion and does not reflect the churches view). Democrats seem to try to separate the choice to have an abortion and agreeing with abortion itself (I.e. I do not support abortion, but I support other peoples right to an abortion). To me this is double speak. If abortion is abhorrent and if one believes that it is killing of a sencient life, they cannot in good conscience believe that it should be okay for a society to support this. As long as "Abortion rights" are a central theme to the Democratic party (and they are), I feel that it is hard to say that you are a die hard Democrat and still say you also support the Church.





Post Date: 1st Dec, 2008 - 8:28pm / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat
A Friend

Page 18 Democrat Mormon Democrat LDS

dbackers,

QUOTE
If abortion is abhorrent and if one believes that it is killing of a sencient life, they cannot in good conscience believe that it should be okay for a society to support this.


First off, for this to be true abortion must be equal to murder. I don't believe it is, and from this quote
QUOTE
As to abortion, it is in my opinion, between sexual sins and murder(in that it is very serious but not on par with the unpardonable sin of murder.).

...you don't either.

So when I read the first quote I also get the impression from you that if something is wrong it should be illegal? To get some perspective--do you think all sexual sins should be illegal? What about premarital sex? When you try to legislate against everything evil, you end up following a plan in my opinion. Satan's plan. Satan wanted to prevent us from doing wrong by making us behave.

QUOTE
As long as "Abortion rights" are a central theme to the Democratic party (and they are), I feel that it is hard to say that you are a die hard Democrat and still say you also support the Church.


Really? Even being a die-hard Democrat or die-hard Republican does not mean that person agrees with absolutely everything his/her party does--or to the same extent, or for the same reasons. I really think that what counts is why you agree with a certain issues and what your motives are. My motives are simple with abortion. I do not agree with it for the most part, but if I want to have the greatest impact on the number of abortions performed I would spend my time and money on educating women--not trying to pass a law. This, I personally believe, would have the greatest affect on preventing abortions and that is my goal. Reduction with women making informed decisions.

Rather off topic, but...
QUOTE
This is a little off topic but I am interested in hearing what others have to say. In the LDS religion is abortion considered murder or just taking away an opportunity to provide a body. Here is why I ask. No LDS publication calls it murder, but rather taking away an opportunity to provide a body for a spirit. Also on my mission, I did baptismal interviews for some investigators who had abortions, and the baptism was always Ok'ed, and it was treated much different then murder. I also did a baptism interview where murder was an issue with the convert and it had to go up to the twelve to get the approval or not for the baptism. So there seemed to be a difference between the two in church policy.


This is a hard one to answer--though I can think of more reasons to believe that the spirit does not enter the body at conception. The church does not seal stillborn children to their parents. Why? I guess we don't know. Back in seminary I was taught that 3 Nephi 1:13 was often cited as a pro-abortion scripture. Christ is speaking to Nephi about his birth, which occurs the next day. Isn't his spirit supposed to be in Mary's belly? Of course, I was taught that this was divine investiture--which is where someone speaks on behalf of Christ instead of it being Christ himself. So, I guess we'll never know for sure.

Post Date: 15th Dec, 2008 - 11:58pm / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat
A Friend

Democrat Mormon Democrat LDS

A person who commits an abortion, I believe can do it innocently. They may not know that it is wrong especially if their government sanctions the act. Murder, or shedding innocent blood is called such because generally speaking, and by divine design the light of Christ teaches the human heart that it is wrong to kill, and by that light, they know it is wrong. That is my opinion.

However, I do think that both acts can be considered murder, especially if a special judge (Mission pres, bap interviewer, Bishop, Stk pres, gen auth,) has determined that the person knowingly aborted a fetus.

If you baptized an individual and they have aborted a fetus, they were probably doing it unaware and the Spirit of the Lord prompted the person doing the interview. I believe, and maybe I am mistaken, that it requires a general authority's approval before anyone who has committed an abortion can be baptized. At least that is what I remember from my mission to Nebraska.

I wonder though if politics have played a role in blurring the lines between the shedding of innocent blood (murder) and Abortion? (as if it is not obvious) The Liberals have said that it is not wrong to abort a fetus. In fact, they tell people that our right to choose is at stake should we not be able to continue to practice abortion. They tell people it is better left to individual choice, or that it is up to the states to decide. Really? I am curious how abortion differs from shedding innocent blood. I really would like somebody to explain this difference to me. I mean really, who made the mistake, the unborn or the mother and father of the unborn. Who is being punished for it?

I believe the real debate should be centered around this question: At which state is the fetus considered an embodied Spirit child of God? How wrong is it to abort a fetus if the spirit hadn't yet been assigned to the body?

18th Dec, 2008 - 11:56pm / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat

QUOTE
If you baptized an individual and they have aborted a fetus, they were probably doing it unaware and the Spirit of the Lord prompted the person doing the interview. I believe, and maybe I am mistaken, that it requires a general authority's approval before anyone who has committed an abortion can be baptized. At least that is what I remember from my mission to Nebraska.


I am not sure what you mean by not being aware of the act of abortion. But I know that in my mission the handful of those I did baptize the mission President was the one that Ok'ed it or one of his councilors. I never had him turn down anyone over this issue. However the 2 murders that I did baptize it did go to a general authority and in 1 case to an apostle.



Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for FREE to JB's Youtube Channel!
Post Date: 19th Dec, 2008 - 12:12am / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat
A Friend

LDS Democrat Mormon Democrat - Page 18

I could be wrong, but if I remember correctly, I was required to have a GA approve a baptism for a person who has committed or been a party to committing an abortion. I was saying that if a person flew through the interview, the interviewer probably knew, by the spirit, that the person was not accountable for the sin of abortion. Or did it not knowing it was wrong. I am not sure about the policy these days.

Post Date: 27th Dec, 2008 - 5:03am / Post ID: #

LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat
A Friend

LDS Democrat Mormon Democrat Mormon Doctrine Studies - Page 18

I have disavowed association with any political party since 2003. I felt at the time that my morals and values were not in line with those espoused by any party. Over the years, I have increasingly felt that many politicians (and I'm afraid it might in reality be a majority) rely on deception and subterfuge to achieve their political objectives. I am constantly reminded of the admonition given to Joseph Smith to forego affiliation with any established churches in his day, who "honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me." Call me a joykill if you want, but while some would not have voted for Mittt Romney because he is mormon, I don't think I would have voted for him because he is a mormon politician.

When I vote, I mainly go to vote on propositions and other measures on the ballot.

In response to the recent posts regarding abortion (which perhaps belong in a topic addressing that issue specifically), I don't believe murder to be unpardonable. As I understand the scriptures, all who attain a kingdom of glory receive a complete remission of their sins, and receive the greatest level of glory that their soul can withstand.


 
> TOPIC: LDS Democrat - Mormon Democrat
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,