Re: Democrat LDS? Nighthawk
That's certainly true, as far as it goes. However, the party politicos don't like it much when people vote against party ideas.
Also, the core consituencies really don't like it when party representatives vote against them. Since these core groups provide most of the funding and publicity, going against them is not a good thing.
For example, imagine a Democrat Senator who votes against the teachers' unions. He or she might as well pack their bags, because they are not likely to get the Democrat nomination next time around. Or, heaven help a Democrat who angers the NOW.
On the other hand, a Repulican who votes to raise taxes, restrict gun rights and liberalize abortions is not going to get a lot of support from Republican core constituencies.
This is where LDS principles (or any moral code) comes into play. I, personally, don't see how LDS principles can line up at all with what the Democratic party has become. It is controlled by those who seek further expansion of governmental power into every aspect of our lives, increased abortions, reduced personal liberty, reduced property rights, and continued lowering of standards of behavior.
The Republican party isn't much better, as it seems to be controlled by the Social Democrats as well. They do fight a rear guard action about gun rights, some property and individual liberty issues, and abortion. But there is very little actual fighting for real property rights and reduced government. Witness the fact that all but one Republican representative voted for the USA PATRIOT ACT.
Even the perennial LDS favorite, Orrin Hatch, voted for it, and he continually pushes for the "flag burning" amendment. If I remember right, he was a moving force in the recent "campaign finance reform" movement.
So, I, personally, find a huge disconnect between LDS principles and the Democratic party.
Nighthawk
Re: Democrat LDS? Farseer
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" - Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
What a lot of people in the U.S. tend to forget is that we started as a REPUBLIC, not a Democracy. We pledge allegiance to the Republic, not the Democracy. A Republic is supposed to be run by the People, not by the Government, and the Representatives of the People should act on behalf of, and for the benefit of, those who elected them.
A democracy, on the other hand, is MAJORITY RULE -- even if it is also supposed to be a government by and for the people.
Right now in the U.S. we have kind of a weird hybrid of the two forms. And we are quickly losing ground in personal liberty. Most people don't see it because they are too involved with their day-to-day living to pay much attention to politics. I was that way too for a long time.
The USA PATRIOT ACT, the War On Drugs, and others exchange our personal liberties for "security" or "safety." Here's another quote from Benjamin Franklin: "Those who exchange liberty for security
will soon find that they have neither." (this is mostly misquoted as 'deserve neither' and which may be more true)
I don't think it matters much which of the two main political parties is "in charge." They have both become so corrupt as to be indistinguishable from each other. So not much good is done by either party; they are too busy trying to strip power from the others and hoard it to themselves.
As LDS members we need to be on our guard, particularly in these latter days, to protect ourselves and not affiliate with or support organizations that support laws that go against our deeply-held beliefs. It's hard to get involved, and for a lot of people with "other things" to worry about, this just isn't important enough to them to do anything about. But this is how "slippage" starts... when good men (and women) do nothing.
In my opinion, of course.
Roz
Re: Democrat LDS? Nighthawk
QUOTE |
As LDS members we need to be on our guard, particularly in these latter days, to protect ourselves and not affiliate with or support organizations that support laws that go against our deeply-held beliefs. It's hard to get involved, and for a lot of people with "other things" to worry about, this just isn't important enough to them to do anything about. |
QUOTE |
Absolutely. But I think it is more than just being involved with "other things". I think it is very hard for most of us to see any way of making a real difference. Both parties are so fully controlled by the real money, that most of us can't see how our messages can cut through the noise. Of course, we can always join a "third party" or run as independants, but there is seldom enough money available for us to even get our messages out, let alone make a difference. |
QUOTE |
The Left believes marriage should be redefined and judges alone are entitled to do so. The Right believes the millennia-old definition of marriage as between members of the two sexes is inviolable and that it can't be redefined by jurists. |
QUOTE |
The Left identifies with the values of most university professors in the liberal arts and values their insights. The Right regards most of these professors as moral idiots. |
Re: Democrat LDS? Farseer
Ha! Those are great quotes... okay, here I go again, running off on a tangent when I should be doing dishes or laundry or something else constructive... Honestly, my job really gets in the way of my *real* life... (If I could make a living by researching stuff I want to learn, I'd be a happy woman.)
Roz (Ayn Rand, anyone?)
Re: Democrat LDS? imanua Yes - one can be a good member of the LDS Church and be a Democrat. These issues are politicized for political reasons. For me, the most important issue, and something that I keep reminding everyone is to be aware of our freedom to make choices. Without the our liberty as individuals to choose for ourselves, but rather just follows blindly, then we'll loose our greatest blessing. Remember Lucifer?
Than again, why Democrat or Republican? What about other parties, or even new parties?
Re: Democrat LDS? JB@Trinidad
QUOTE |
Than again, why Democrat or Republican? What about other parties, or even new parties? |
I have just revisited this topic, a little bit. I am leaning more and more towards libertarian ideas. I am currently reading some material from the Ludwig von Mises Institute which teaches the Austrian School of Economics. The Austrian School is very libertarian, free market, and freedom oriented. I find it very much like my understanding of the Gospel, although I am positive that many, maybe even most, members would disagree (thus my self description as an Unorthodox Mormon ).
NightHawk
I was just wondering how many democrat LDS will vote for Kerry this coming election and if there are those who are disappointed with Bush and will just vote to get him out. The Church seems to unofficially stand with the Republicans (bold statement, but that is how I have seen it, correct me if I am wrong) and so the membership just follows... or is it that members in general really do not think for themselves politically? I bring this up because I have never heard of an LDS party or at least one formed on the view points of the LDS. I think Joseph Smith made a bold move when he ran for President and possibly was trying to tell us something?
Actually, there is an LDS oriented political party. I think it is the Independant American Party. It is in Utah. It may be loosely associated with the Constitution Party. The problem I have with it is that it is formed BECAUSE of a prophecy, that is, some members have created it and named it because Joseph Smith reportedly prophesied about it.
I know a few LDS who will vote for Kerry. I think it is too bad, as he is completely opposed to everything that Mormonism stands for.
NightHawk
About the LDS Party... then why hasn't some LDS in Utah got together and just formed one rather than associate themselves with the Republicans or Democratsor even a supposed Prophecy? Surely they will get enough votes?
About Kerry... well have you ever confronted them with their standards vs. his standards kind of talk? Or is it that they will just do anything to get Bush out?
I live in Massachusetts where the majority of citizens (at least those born and raised here) are democrat or if not official enrolled as democrat, vote democrat. I think, even a number of the Church members. They vote for the social programs and ignore the lack of morality. At least that is what I see.
I think we need to decide which is more important. For me the moral issues are greater. I don't think we lack for social programs in this country, but we sure are having trouble with morality. I don't know how anyone can vote for a major democrat party member in the state things are currently and then cry about how we lack morals in this country. Things change when the people make them change. If people continue to elect people who stand for people of low morality or for a member of a party of low morality, they are saying it doesn't matter that much to them.
It may be a choice of the lesser of two evils, but that is a start.
Edited: tenaheff on 17th Mar, 2004 - 12:09am