Related Information to Make Drugs Legal?

Make Drugs Legal? - Page 6

What will they think of next? What are those law makers going to do - bring in a law that says something cannot taste a certain way? I am sure they will use the argument that it entices feelings for something illegal and that the pop is actually an accomplice.

Pot-flavored pops a hit with candy lovers, but not lawmakers
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:47 pm PDT

CourtTV - (Court TV) - At Spencer's Gifts store in New York and Chicago, lollipops are flying off the shelves. The stores keep restocking, and people keep buying.
Ref. https://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...butnotlawmakers

Legal Drugs Make

Well, I have mixed feelings, but since it isn't illegal to sell candy cigarettes to kids, then I don't think this should be illegal either. Now, as a parent, I wouldn't allow my children to buy them. In my opinion, stop demand and supply will go away.

Since marijuana is smoked, not eaten, I wonder how they can really taste like marijuana. Does it taste like what it would taste like to eat marijuana or does it taste like the smoke?

Make Drugs Legal? Health & Special Psychology

State wants to weed out marijuana-flavor candy

Reuters - Connecticut on Tuesday joined a growing effort to weed out marijuana-flavored candy from store shelves when its attorney general said he would sponsor a statewide ban on "Pot Suckers" lollipops.
Ref. https://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._life_candydope

Page 6 Legal Drugs Make

This is exactly my point of government. Early in the 80's they realize citizens are feeling way too good - WHOA - CAN'T HAVE THAT! ~Let's make up some phony lab work to say that ecstacy makes holes in the brain and show them some very illustrated and computer enhanced MRI and CT Scans of brains with dark areas in them.~ Only in years to come a reputable news outlet airs a story discrediting the early government reports and gives us another reason to not believe anything the government says.
I don't like the war on drugs, and I agree with a lot of what FunBiker is saying about this because if you ban this you must ban sugar and carbohydrates too because people can't control themselves and eat themselves to early death. I understand the dangerous aspects of the production of these synthetic drugs like ecstacy because they are not produced in the most sterile places or synthesized by the most intelligent people on this planet, but you also don't know what goes into your food when you eat out at a restaurant!
Ecstacy was used in early European times to help people with social anxiety or couples that were having intimacy problems in their relationship. How can something that can help people become more empathetic be banned and so harshly scheduled?

Message Edited! Persephone: Message edited. Do not attempt to use strong language in your posts

Legal Drugs Make

Simply because people use it for the wrong reasons. Let's put the example of alcohol for instance, it is great for the washing and cleaning of the body.nevertheless some people use it and abuse it to the point of becoming alcoholics. Same applies with marijuana's healing properties and with every other plant or drug. I believe almost everything in our planet is for our benefit (healing), the point is that some people just use it plain wrong.

Make Drugs Legal?

I can't understand why drugs aren't legalised. At the end of the day, illegal drugs only makes criminals richer. If the government controlled supply they could make as much money out of it as they do cigarettes and alcohol.

Cigarettes and alcohol are responsible for more deaths than all the illicit dugs combined many times over.

People don't take drugs because they are legal or illegal. They do for a wide variety of reasons. Making illicit drugs legal will not lead to a flood of more people doing them. It will just allow governments to control purity and supply, which means society at least gets some benefit from people taking them, and they are safer to consume.

I'm not cold hearted in saying this. My point point of view is that the "war on drugs" is more a political war than an effort to eradicate drugs or prevent their use. It's certainly not a realistic approach to solving drug-related issues.

The jury is still out on the damage ecstacy causes. Scientists really need to research the long term effects. But I don't believe it is as anti-social as binge drinking or pot. As pointed out earlier, its effects do not encourage violent or dangerous behaviour.

So it is strange that it has such a bad name. Especially given the large quantity of people who regularly take it and how few deaths result.

Edited: arvhic on 2nd Aug, 2005 - 11:52am

Make Drugs Legal - Page 6

MARIJUANA PARTY MEMBERS FACE CHARGES IN B.C. SUPREME COURT

Three members of the B.C. Marijuana Party will be in British Columbia's Supreme Court on Tuesday, charged with selling marijuana seeds by mail order to the United States.
Ref. https://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/20.ana-050802.html

Make Drugs Legal Psychology Special & Health - Page 6

55-YEAR SENTENCE FOR FIRST-TIMER APPEALED

Angelos' case sparks debate about minimum-mandatory laws. By the time Weldon Angelos is released from prison on a first-time federal drug conviction, he will be 80 years old.
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...61649%2C00.html