![>](style_images/Executiv-909/nav_m.gif)
Good stuff. I think I may have a different take on this. (probably not surprising.) I wonder if perhaps we are not making the divide wider then what is really needed to be? I am always concern that perhaps we exclude many of our brothers and sisters more and more. I wonder if our correlation of manuals, the more recent centralization of doctrine, and the ever greater codifying of righteousness that we slowly cut some of our members off. I kind of see this with the new missionary standards. I wonder if our "raising the bar" will exclude more and more people from serving the missions, because of there struggles and different views? I wonder if there is less room for those who have different opinions on doctrine to exist in our church together.
I have been a member for 46 years and it worries me to see the shift into main stream christianity. Changes in the temple (yes I know it is small stuff, but still, what drives all this?) I am sure we all know. It worries me when the prophet replies, "It is not doctrinal" on a question of polygamy. etc etc. I truly wished they would state, well that is what the Lord needed and it is not needed at this time. But it seems that we are almost selling our pioneers down the drain. To state it is not doctrinal is almost stating Joseph was wrong. It worries me to see how little tolerance exists for different points of view. The risk of losing your membership by only thinking about something (temple recommend questions) and sympathizing leaves you out of the temple. That is scary to me. I see people leave for that reason. I have also wondered about the polygamy issue and expect it to become legal in the USA. In Canada where same sex marriage is now legal, they expect polygamy to be legal within the next 10 years. I expect a considerable impact coming from this issue. As I have worked with poly men and talked with LDS church members, I find LDS brothers having a considerable interest towards this subject. The sisters might be another story all together. I think this will or can have a serious falling away from a lot of members. Not like the priesthood for all worthy members, I think it will be much bigger then that.
I guess due to my inactivity for awhile I'm not seeing all these changes you all are talking about. What's been the most notable change so I can do some comparison?
What a great thread! I am very opinionated on this subject and will express my opinion and ask that you forgive me if I sound too authoritative, it is still only my opinion. Also, sorry for the long post, I tried to break it up but wasn't able to make multiple posts...
QUOTE |
Many long time church members who have gone through the motions of church membership without truly being converted come across this material and lose their testimony. In their minds, they were duped all these years by the church. Now they see the truth of the Mormons and are getting out. All of a sudden, the one true church is now a mind controlling organization and is only after your money. |
QUOTE |
To state it is not doctrinal is almost stating Joseph was wrong. |
QUOTE |
On the other hand, I have felt since I was a younger man that my tie was with God and Christ and not the Church (as a collective of imperfect people). |
QUOTE |
I'm reminded of the parable of the ten virgins. All ten were members, but only five entered in with the bridegroom because they were prepared. |
QUOTE |
Actually I think scripturally speaking it says all the opposite, that even the most "elected" will fall and be deceived. |
QUOTE |
26 Verily, verily, I say unto you, if a man marry a wife according to my word, and they are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, according to mine appointment, and he or she shall commit any sin or transgression of the new and everlasting covenant whatever, and all manner of blasphemies, and if they commit no murder wherein they shed innocent blood, yet they shall come forth in the first resurrection, and enter into their exaltation; but they shall be destroyed in the flesh, and shall be delivered unto the buffetings of Satan unto the day of redemption, saith the Lord God. 27 The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, which shall not be forgiven in the world nor out of the world, is in that ye commit murder wherein ye shed innocent blood, and assent unto my death, after ye have received my new and everlasting covenant, saith the Lord God; and he that abideth not this law can in nowise enter into my glory, but shall be damned, saith the Lord. - D&C 132:26-27 |
QUOTE |
Actually I think scripturally speaking it says all the opposite, that even the most "elected" will fall and be deceived. |
QUOTE |
24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. - Matt. 24:24 |
QUOTE |
D&C 1: 14, 18 14 And the arm of the Lord shall be revealed; and the day cometh that they who will not hear the voice of the Lord, neither the voice of his servants, neither give heed to the words of the prophets and apostles, shall be cut off from among the people; |
Rather off topic, but... I am not saying that the servants of the Lord are infallible, but that they are responsible for the kingdom of God as it now stands. They will be responsible if they teach something that is not perfectly correct, yet I have a strong belief that the Lord will not let them lead the Church as a whole astray. Look at Peter in the Primitive Church. He often made mistakes (he was reproved several times by Christ) and probably held views that had to be later corrected. He looked down on Gentiles and had to have his opinion changed by revelation from God. He was not a perfect man, but he was the man that Christ chose to lead his church in his absence. This, I suppose, is a personal choice each member of the Church will have to make ( to give heed to the words of the Prophets or not). I just think we should not readily throw their counsel aside if they make a mistake in their decisions. Men are flawed, but certain men though out time have held keys given to them by God, and they have been commanded by God to spread the message of the gospel though out the earth. If there are not prophets then the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints is not the Church of Christ. And if there are not prophets, then there is no Church on earth that has the keys for the Gathering of Israel, the redeeming of the dead, nor the need for any of the teachings of the Doctrine in Covenants that have been quoted so far. The notion that there can be a church based on the teaching of the Book of Mormon or any Latter day Scriptures without prophets, would negate the need for Joseph Smith to even see God the Father and the Savior Jesus Christ. And it would negate any revelations concerning Callings and Elections being made sure , as they were indeed revealed through prophets. |
Dbackers:
QUOTE |
The Savior does not distinguish between his voice or the voice of his servants the prophets when they speak by the power of the Holy Ghost. So the opinion that we can only rely on ourselves and not need to take counsel from others, seems to be contrary to God's word as found in the Doctrine in Covenants. |
QUOTE |
"Cursed is he that putteth his trust in man, or maketh flesh his arm, or shall hearken unto the precepts of men, save their precepts shall be given by the power of the Holy Ghost.'' (2 Ne. 28:31.) |
QUOTE |
"...that man should not counsel his fellow man, neither trust in the arm of flesh. |
But will that great divide come because the church does not listen to the prophet, or will it be because the Prophet has fallen? I tend to believe it will be because as you say, a hard doctrine will be introduced,that will be difficult for some to follow. I do not know what this is.
It is just my opinion that the Prophet holds the keys to the Church, and that as far as dealing with Temple work, missionary work, the gathering, etc. these keys are held by the Priesthood and the prophet (as given to Joseph Smith though the laying on of hands by those who held these keys in previous dispensations). I believe that we ere when we think these keys are found within us to perform certain obligations in the Church that are not within our stewardship. This is where I think the main divide will be. Members of the Church who believe that they hold the keys to certain responsibilities that can only be held by the Prophets and Apostles and trying to take these responsibilities unto themselves without receiving a calling through the Lord's appointed.
Listening to the counsel of a Prophet has never been considered leaning on the arm of flesh. Through out the scriptures the Lord has admonished us to listen to the counsel of Prophets. This is where I believe the Great divide will occur. Those who choose to heed the counsels of the Lord's anointed and those who choose to ignore these same counsels. Belief in the necessity of heeding to Prophets who have been chosen by the Lord is essential to this discussion, in my opinion.
Rather off topic, but... The definition of Heeding in the dictionary is
This seems to imply testing, considering, paying attention, not just blindly following. Those that have had the most problems with the prophets in the Scriptures are the ones that immediately dismissed them and sent them away without thought. We are admonished to test the words of the Prophets through thoughtful prayer. I believe we can test the words of the Prophets if we do so humbly and with a sincere desire to know the truth of their words |