QUOTE |
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Wednesday rejected an emergency appeal from a California atheist who wanted to block recitation of prayers at President Bush's inaugural ceremonies. The ruling means prayer ceremonies will proceed as they have in past inaugurations. |
This question interest me very much. As an agnostic of sorts, I do not feel the need to stifle others religious practices either in private or in public. An atheist is supposed to be someone that doesn't believe in God. One without belief. This particular person, it would seem, not only has no belief in God, but most likely an extreme dislike of God. I would think that something at some point happened to him that was very traumatic. He may not disbelieve in God as much as he BLAMES God for what happened to him. I cannot think of another reason someone would go to such extremes to eliminate God or prayer from a situation. The inaugeration really has no direct bearing on or effect of him at all and therefore it shouldn't bother him that they are praying at it.
From my experience, people who are so against anything religious at all usually blame God for something that happened. If not, then they usually aren't this adamant. Take myself for example, while I prescribe to no orthodoxed religion, I have absolutely no problem with prayer in school or in any public forum or arena. Nothing has happened in my life to make me dislike God, which is, in my opinion, why some people try so hard to remove God from public situations.
Oh, so perfectly expressed. (If I could raise your charisma yet, I would ) I completely agree with your impressions. I only wonder if I could be missing something? My view of situations like this is limited to my own personal beliefs, so I wondered what other people thought, maybe enlightening my perceptions some. It doesn't seem to me that the practice of most religious beliefs hurts anyone, unless it supports any beliefs or actions that advocate any type of violence, hate, or immorality. This is America, and I always believed we should be tolerant and open-minded about other people's beliefs. I just don't see the purpose from where I stand of this man's actions.
Edited: dawnofthenew on 20th Jan, 2005 - 3:38pm
If you take a close look at these type of situations, you will find that the majority of problems tolerating other religious beliefs center completely around Christianity. I'm not sure why, maybe because of the large amount of christians in this country, but non-religious people seem to be most threatened by their (Christians) religious institutions. Another reason could be because Christians are so willing to take arms against other causes publicly such as in the case of homo-sexual marriage. Perhaps the reason they take arm against their public prayer is because Christians will take public voice against other situations as well. Make yourself known through public voice, and you will always make yourself a target. Antagonist rarely go after those who keep silent.