From ABC News:
In the anarchy that were the first hours of Baghdad's liberation from
Saddam Hussein's vicious grip, many things were stolen. Banks were
looted, offices were ransacked, markets were raided -- even hospitals were
not spared from the looters' spree. The U.S. soldiers and Marines could
not stop it all from happening. Somewhere in that chaos, looters, perhaps
a group of professional thieves, raided the Iraq National Museum of
priceless treasures.
The Iraq National Museum held rare artifacts documenting the early
civilizations of ancient Mesopotamia. The Mesopotamians lived in a
portion of what is now called Iraq and were the first people known to have
studied the stars, develop the written word and enforce a legal code. So,
this is not Iraq's loss, archaeologists point out, it is a loss to all of
mankind. In addition to the many items that were stolen from the
museum--apparently by experts who may have plans to sell them on the black
market--thousands of other objects were simply smashed and destroyed
forever.
Just today, leading archaeologists from around the world gathered at a
meeting of the United Nations cultural body, UNESCO, to demand a ban on
the export of all antiques, works of art, books and archives from Iraq and
freeze international trade of these objects.
Could this have been stopped? Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld rejects
such charges. He said "Looting is an unfortunate thing....To the extent
it happens in a war zone, it's difficult to stop."
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
Could it have been stopped?
Possibly.
It would have required (an amateur's opinion, mind you), a much larger force ( a city of five million people), an far more aggressive stance that may well have alienated the general population, and the use of soldiers completely inept at police tactics.
This would have inevitably led to a huge number of civilian deaths, given the passionate nature of the people themselves and the combat circumstances the soldiers were in.
I, for one can't fault General Franks, as his job was to plan a successful war, not keep the annuls of history. And, I don't remember hearing anyone else in the world bring it up before now either. Certainly I never thought about it. Did you, JB?
And, I still haven't heard anyone (except me) ask the question, does not part of the responsibility lie with the Iraqi people themselves? they are looting themselves, robbing their own neighbors? What happened to "the proud Iraqi people"?
They are looting their neighbors and then griping to the US to stop it. Does no one but me see the contradiction here?
I do hate to see the loss of these treasures, being an avid student of history. The FBI and Interpol are already on it, and I hope they can recover some of them.
But I also wonder, does this not sound a bit organized? Are we dealing with someone who anticipated just this very thing and planned for it?
Stranger, glad you liked the article. Despite the hit squad you've sent after me, I still like your posts, usually, as I think you do give much thoughts when you write. But, I somehow think that you also tend to believe everything the military says or do. Maybe you have been a military man yourself, so obedience to your superiors must not be questioned?
QUOTE |
This would have inevitably led to a huge number of civilian deaths, given the passionate nature of the people themselves and the combat circumstances the soldiers were in. |
QUOTE |
I, for one can't fault General Franks, as his job was to plan a successful war, not keep the annuls of history. And, I don't remember hearing anyone else in the world bring it up before now either. Certainly I never thought about it. Did you, JB? |
QUOTE |
But I also wonder, does this not sound a bit organized? Are we dealing with someone who anticipated just this very thing and planned for it? |
QUOTE |
And, I still haven't heard anyone (except me) ask the question, does not part of the responsibility lie with the Iraqi people themselves? they are looting themselves, robbing their own neighbors? What happened to "the proud Iraqi people"? They are looting their neighbors and then griping to the US to stop it. Does no one but me see the contradiction here? |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
Fireduck,
As a matter of fact, I am a military man. But blind obedience has never been my forte, as a quick look at my record would quickly reveal.
I don't even agree with all of the conflicts the US has engaged in over the years.
I hesitate to criticize in this situation because of the monkey wrench Turkey threw in. We could have had 60,000 more troops on the ground from the get-go, but had to plan around that.
All in all, this will go down in history as one of the most brilliant strategies ever conceived and executed. There is no telling how many lives on both sides General Franks saved by this lightning attack.
What I am concerned with now is the rebuilding. I would like to see the fundamentals addressed, and pronto.
Water, electricity, food, getting the people stirred up and back to work.
I love seeing them arguing and demanding from our troops. It is a GOOD sign. It tells you that no matter that they are arguing with them, they feel safe with our guys. They know they are not going to be harmed, and they are able to gripe and moan and complain for the first time in their lives.
But things are beginning to happen. Other countries in the region are sending aid in, some of the coalition nations are sending peacekeeping forces (what happened to unilateral?).
It is just going to take time.
LDS,
Yes, they are charged with the responsibility of "keeping the peace", and I am sure they will. All things take time.
It's a little difficult to chase down looters when you've got snipers firing at you from a rooftop. It will take time, but it will happen.
QUOTE |
What I am concerned with now is the rebuilding. I would like to see the fundamentals addressed, and pronto. Water, electricity, food, getting the people stirred up and back to work. |
QUOTE |
I love seeing them arguing and demanding from our troops. It is a GOOD sign. It tells you that no matter that they are arguing with them, they feel safe with our guys. They know they are not going to be harmed, and they are able to gripe and moan and complain for the first time in their lives. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
Yes, I personally think they are taking too long.
Yes, they probably could have planned it better.
The international people are not being held up by the troops. There are a couple of forces at work there.
1- Security. They are afraid, the place still being quite dangerous.
2- Many of them want to make sure they are not associated with the military in any way.
3- The pro-active christian ones have been told by the Iraqis to stay out. They don't want to hear the preaching.
4- The UN is trying to use the supplies they control as leverage against the US.
As for them demanding our troops get out, that is a good thing. That shows they are getting their spirit back and want to carve out their own destinies.
The possibility of a Muslim State exists, but it really isn't up to us to decide. We can only hope.
Saddam still hiding out? Entirely possible. He is a wily fox. But I think the US will be there long enough to smoke him out.
I don't think much of his chances since the US has Army Rangers, Delta Force the CIA and the British SAS in country.
The British SAS are the best in the world, bar none. If he's there, they will find him.
QUOTE |
1- Security. They are afraid, the place still being quite dangerous. |
QUOTE |
2- Many of them want to make sure they are not associated with the military in any way. |
QUOTE |
3- The pro-active christian ones have been told by the Iraqis to stay out. They don't want to hear the preaching. |
QUOTE |
4- The UN is trying to use the supplies they control as leverage against the US. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%