I watched a Iraqi video today on TV how the government of Saddam killed this 4 men accused of terrorism. They put a bomb, yes a bomb on their bodies and detonate it... oh gosh, why they had to do something so evil?. why make them suffer in such a way???
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
Do you think that this was the correct action to take or is it a counter productive act of democracy?
From CNN:
OFFICIALS: BAN ON BAATHISTS DELAYS IRAQI GOVERNMENT
The decision to ban senior Baath Party members from holding jobs in a future
Iraqi government will delay the handover of control to Iraqis, senior
officials with the Pentagon's Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian
Assistance said.
https://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/05/17/...main/index.html
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
QUOTE |
Do you think that this was the correct action to take or is it a counter productive act of democracy? |
QUOTE |
The US cannot ban anyone if they are to go there to preach democracy! And, there are lots of examples to learn from .... Indonesia's Golkar party is still in the political system but kept in check by the others. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
George Soros is said to set up a watchdog group to monitor any abuses of Iraqi oil resources. Strange, coming from him because he is known for rampaging through the financial markets and clobbering the economies of nations into near bankruptcy. He calls it free market forces, and pockets billions of dollars in the process. Smaller nations think he is just an opportunist who doesn't care much about how people, who are out of his sphere of concern, suffer as a result.
So, what do you think? Is he really concerned about the Iraqi people or is he just monitoring as to when another opportunity to profit comes along?
QUOTE |
Smaller nations think he is just an opportunist who doesn't care much about how people, who are out of his sphere of concern, suffer as a result. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
Well, the United Nations approved the new resolution which will allow the USA and Britain to stay in Iraq in power until a new government takes place : what do you all think?
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
Is this the final analysist?
From Deseret News:
IRAQ VICTORY HAS FAILED TO REDUCE PERILS
The U.S. military victory in Iraq has done little so far to reduce international
terrorism, halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction or promote a broader
Mideast peace, the three goals President Bush cited most frequently in
justifying the war, say a growing number of critics.
https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...35622%2C00.html
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%