Mormons & Marital Intimacy
Recently a thread was started about interviews and what can be asked. Some members once experienced being asked about their s-xual activities (within marriage). Now WITHOUT being GRAPHIC or DETAILED the discussion is... Are there wrong and right ways of being sexually intimate with your spouse? If there was/is, why is it left to each member, are there quotes about it or that suggest such, why was it once part of the interview?
QUOTE |
are there wrong and right ways of being sexually intimate with your spouse? If there was/is, why is it left to each member, are there quotes about it or that suggest such, why was it once part of the interview? |
Click on the link below for a letter from the First presidency back in 1982 regarding interviews and what should be discussed. you'll have to click on page 2 to see where the First presidency stated oral sex is an unholy and inpure practice. I have heard that they sent a follow up letter later recanting this position, as a result of considerable objections from church members, although I have never seen it. I think the follow up letter was supposed to have said that Bishops are not suppose to interpret what is unholy, it is up to each couple to determine this.
https://www.lds-mormon.com/worthy_letter.shtml
I remember when my first husband and I were talking with our bishop once during an interview and this subject came up. The bishop mentioned that when he had interviewed another couple, and told them a particular sexual act was forbidden, the wife piped up and said, "But I like it." The bishop said he nearly fell out of his chair.
It was inappropriate, in my opinion, for the bishop to relate that piece of information to us -- it would have given someone the "head's up" that they had better not admit if they were indulging in that practice, because they would not get their recommends. I don't remember now what it was, but it was in 1981.
Roz
QUOTE |
Now, if it be true that members began to kick up a storm about it, yet it be unholy, then why rescind it |
In this case, I don't think that rescinding the original statement was to please Babylon. I think it was more a case that the First Presidency realized that it wasn't appropriate for bishops and branch presidents to be asking such detailed questions. In fact, I have heard stories that when detailed questions are asked, it actually promotes people to search out more information and get involved in such practices.
It may have also been a move away from a bit of legalism.
My personal view follows in line with Nighthawk's. Now the next question is what is the right and wrong way of sexual intimacy. The First Presidency has already given us one - they said that oral sex is wrong. This may or may not make you wonder what else may be 'wrong' for you to do in bed, but as it says... we need to find out from the Lord. Sad thing is... so many people seem to get so many different 'answers' from the Lord.