What you've said REALLY SHOCKED ME, you didn't really understand the points of the doctrine of our church concerning the leaders of our church. I ask, have you've been to seminary, institute, sunday schools, have read all the fine books in our church? Do you read the scripture everyday? If you have not done it or not doing it regularly, then do it now. Or if you have done it, then you do not ponder it or do not understand them at all.
Now, I'm going to repeat the things we've learned from the church:
1) Articles of Faith no. 5
No, I'm not shocked about praying to get confirmation because I know that, you're judging me too.
Oh, so you mean the Bishop is the only person who could say these things to you? How about your wife, your home teachers, and the others who cares for you?
Yes, there is a set order, that's what we believe, am I right? You have a very nice gospel resume and you're even a stake leader now and then you still don't believe this? How come? Don't you have read these things and heared this in our General Authorities? Now don't you misinterpret what I have said before that I didn't mean blind obedience because our wise Bishops never also do or say or counsel these things to us, they are guided and they know what to do. I didn't also experience a leader telling me what to do when it's far beyond his calling. Leaders I knew never dominate or tell me things what should I do with my church assignments because they believe and trust that mostly members do their own best judgements, wisdom, discretion, and confirmation from God through their prayers concerning their callings. And if they counsel, it all based in the scriptures or the words of our authorities or prophets. They're there to remind us and do repetitive counsels for us. Now don't you also misunderstand me that I don't believe we should pray first for confirmation if that leader extending a calling to you or gave you counsel, I believe in that thing so don't you bother me anymore about this thing because I'm not a robot doing that blind obedience.
What I meant to say is if I have that good feeling of that leader's counsel, then why not do it. If I doubt, then I explain things to him politely and then ask God for confirmation if which of us is correct. I do not mean all leaders make all the right choices, but when they're called-it came from God and after that the Lord will leave them to choose good or evil. So it's a matter of their future doings, if in the end they're found in hypocrisy, then they would taken out of their places. Again, I repeat, they are called of God because the church of Christ is not a house of confusion, but of orderliness and perfect organization and then I again repeat that they would be pulled out if in the end they are found not worthy anymore of their church standing. So, that means they wasted the opportunity that God called them to do. Like King David, he was called, but he transgressed and was moved out of his place. Now, what if I tell you you are not called of God? ? How would you feel? Now, I say to you that you are called of God as a stake leader but of course what God requires of you is how you endure. So, I hope you get my point.
Well, nice to know that news, I was not updated with that and that was so terrible! I really believe the scripture when it says, "Many are called, but few are chosen." Now, my explanation to this is what I've stated above. Now that's the thing we should be aware and careful of, even us who have good reputation in the church could be tempted if we're not careful.
Why did you say it's not correct? I've read it from our books even from the writings and counsels of our General Authorities and that's what the Holy Ghost taught me as I ponder the scriptures? Explain that to me.
So you're really judging me because you don't believe that I don't believe these things, you also didn't know what I know and am trying to explain and even what's inside my heart and mind and now you insisted that I have problem to what you've said? Oh, come on Sister, you be careful also.
So, you mean I don't have the right to tell these things to people I know? How do you understand the verse that says,
OK who started this topic? (laugh)
Difficult yet easy.
Difficult because of the fact that you might find yourself in a disciplinary council. Easy, because, I can just never ever blindly follow anybody. Well, let me qualify that, if I am asked to do something and there is no time to discuss it, I will go ahead and do what they asked me and then later have a meeting / discussion etc. If we do have the time, then I will ask a number of questions as to the how and why. If there would not be any reasonable logical explanation, then I would do what my heart dictates. But I would certainly discuss this with my Heavenly Father. (Pray about it)
Sometimes these things can border on using their priesthood in unrighteous dominion. It has upset me greatly in the past when some very prominent BYU scholars were excommunicated because they were asked not to talk about certain topics, like Heavenly Mother etc. Adam-God theory.
This totally clashes with Joseph Smith's statements that the Methodists had creeds and you had to adhere to them or you would lose your membership. And he was happy that he could talk about all things without having to be afraid of such things, yet here we are...
But this question really is realistic. Bruce R.McConkie suggested to edit the Journal of Discourses and take all the irritants out. The problem was that there were already too many copies out there. So they dropped the project. I can see that one day it will be off the shelf.
Thanks for that, all you've said is right.
She just replied to the explanations or views and opinions and the things I've learned from our church and spiritual experiences, but went out negative because she had different opinions from mine. I came to realize that this isn't good, we became more hotter and lost our moods that's why it's better that we ended up. Well, in regards to what you've said, I don't want to discuss topics about really, really deeper doctrines like Heavenly Mother or Adam-God, etc...
Like what we have discussed many times about leaders that we should sustain and follow their counsels, but there she goes-focused on the bad stories of past leaders and that she said not all of them were called, etc etc. Well, maybe I was right when I defended it, am I right, Brother? This is an international forum, but sometimes we're or others are tempted to go far beyond and then debate.
I could say I am right when I defended to what she said, it's not really deep doctrine. Well, maybe you could tell me if my defending was right or wrong. Because as an LDS, we also can be frank to others so that they may learn. I didn't mean I'm perfect.
Thanks for your feedback and explanation.