Post Date: 14th Nov, 2009 - 12:07am / Post ID:
#
Mormonism Things Strange Some
QUOTE (Spencer @ 13-Nov 09, 5:49 PM)
1. Joseph Smith Sr., the patriarch of the church soon after organization, gave Oliver Huntington a blessing that he would preach to people on the moon. This is supposedly Oliver Huntington's statement:
"In my patriarchal blessing, given by the father of Joseph the Prophet, in Kirtland, 1837, I was told that I should preach the gospel before I was 21 years of age; that I should preach the gospel to the inhabitants upon the islands of the sea, and -- to the inhabitants of the moon, even the planet you can now see with your eyes"
2. Brigham Young also said that the Sun is inhabited. Its actually right after what he said above about the moon. Again, go to google books and search "journal of discourses." One of the first ones that comes up should be volume 13.
I am quite familiar with your points so I would try my best to answer your questions. In the quote provided there are a couple of inconsistencies. For some reason, it is reported that Oliver Huntington received his patriarchal blessing from Joseph Smith Sr when in records show it was actually Huntington's father who gave him a blessing. The source of the statement attributed to Joseph Smith comes from Oliver's journal where he claims he had the information from Philo Dibble. So, we're speaking about a third hand account. We can also keep in mind he received this patriarchal blessing when he was only 10 years old and his claims were made fifty years later.
There is no where in the scripture where it states that prophets are not allowed to have a personal opinion. In the nineteen century, these ideas were not crazy at all but quite popular. So it is well possible that Joseph Smith, Brigham Young as well as others believe what science believed at that time and they in fact believed the sun and the moon were possible inhabited. There were also many hoaxes that I am sure many brethren also believed.
William Herschel who was a German Astronomer held these views many years before this incident when he told a disbelieving astronomer:
QUOTE "Who can say that it is not extremely probable, nay beyond doubt, that there must be inhabitants on the Moon of some kind or another?"
If you think about it, can you certainly state you're 100% sure (based on facts) that the moon or the sun don't have inhabitants? I don't think anyone can. Man landed in the moon and covered only a little portion of it, we really don't know. Didn't John the Revelator stated that he saw an angel standing in the sun? I think there is so much more to see that we really don't have the answer for.
QUOTE 3. I may be looking at this out of context or something, but it seems like Smith is saying that Christ would come 56 years after he made that statement. He said "fifty six years should wind up the scene." I was wondering how to refute the claim that Joseph Smith was not a prophet if he did make this statement.
Again, we're getting third hand information. We do not have a copy of the talk where he supposedly said that but just a compilation of different diaries of people who claimed to be there, one of them....Oliver Huntington. So if the antis want to accuse Joseph Smith of being a false prophet, shouldn't they have at least a FIRST hand account? But assuming he did, there are some inconsistencies with a key word in that statement. In History of the Church II: 182 states:
QUOTE ....and it was the will of God that those who went to Zion, with a determination to lay down their lives, if necessary, should be ordained to the ministry, and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, or the coming of the Lord, which was nigh--even fifty-six years should wind up the scene.
Klaus Hanson incorrectly stated that Joseph Smith said that fifty-six years wouldwind up the scene. See? Just one word makes a whole difference, isn't? Unfortunately in Church history, we have several scholars making similar mistakes or contradicting each other.
There are many, many quotes if you search after this incident that indicates that Joseph Smith never prophesied the Lord's coming would be in fifty-six years. Did he have an opinion on the issue? It seems like he did. In Doctrine and Covenants 130:14-17, he mentioned that the second coming would not occur before 1891, but left open the actual time of Christ's return.
QUOTE 4. David W. Patten-D&C 114:1
Patten died before he served that mission.
The section is not a prophecy but just a mission call. It is interesting though the emphasis on setting all his affairs in order which he did when he died, so his family was took care of. Plus, who knows if Brother Patten's mission was not in the other side of the veil?
I hope these answers may help a bit.