As been pointed out many times, GAs are given an 'aura' by members sometimes as though they are infallible, we know this is not true, especially as a few of them have fallen. This has been a great embarrassment for the Church, but is there something to be learnt? This thread has been started to analyze the cause of their fall and if they were ever truly true to the Faith.
We can start with George P. Lee, a man that had some rebellious views, and caused great hurt to the Church and himself...
QUOTE |
We can start with George P. Lee, a man that had some rebellious views, and caused great hurt to the Church and himself... |
Some people on an email list where I am active personally know George Lee, and have written about the situation. It is extremely troublesome.
He was very concerned about the fact that in the 60s and 70s, the Church was apparently involved in some shady practices concerning the Lamanite programs. There are serious allegations of Church representatives forcibly taking Indian children from their homes and placing them in white homes. But he continued to work within the system, as much as he could, to resolve these problems.
His other great concern was that he saw the GAs riding first class on all their flights, driving big, beautiful cars, having wonderful offices, etc, at the expense of the Church. He publicly denounced these practices as being priestcraft. He also pointed out how the GAs now seem to be chosen based on their success in business matters (worldly success) rather than their spirituality.
I think these are all valid concerns, and need to be publicly addressed.
From what people who know him personally have said, he was set up for the charges of adultery and/or molestation. They don't talk about the charges, other than to say that he was set up. These charges were the foundation upon which he was excommunicated.
I don't know for sure. Just reporting what his friends have said.
I wonder what he is doing now? Some of these tend to setup some sort of contact, or mission with regards to addressing these issues, but I guess he decided to remain quiet? As far as being setup... by who? Alligations so high as those wiould either have to be true or false.
QUOTE |
I wonder what he is doing now? Some of these tend to setup some sort of contact, or mission with regards to addressing these issues, but I guess he decided to remain quiet? |
QUOTE (JB@Trinidad @ 6-Apr 04, 12:02 PM) |
I wonder what he is doing now? Some of these tend to setup some sort of contact, or mission with regards to addressing these issues, but I guess he decided to remain quiet? As far as being setup... by who? Alligations so high as those wiould either have to be true or false. |
QUOTE |
George P. Lee was an extrememly well educated (Harvard or Yale) native Americann whom Pres. Kimball called to the Seventy. What I was told, ny people who were in a position to know, is that he was apalled at all the perks, the expensive clothes, the first class airline tickets, etc. etc. and complained about them - at which time he was removed from his calling - and eventually excommunicated. I was shown the "evidence" used against him when he was exed, how it was obtained, and what it cost to obtain it. Bro. Lee had written a book about his life long before his excommunication, and you had a very hard time believing all this was about the same person. |
Thanks for the info. What exactly did he plead 'no-contest' too?
Now to throw in another GA.. Paul H. Dunn... he was known as a great storyteller and had authored many many books. One of the stories he wrote appeared in the Ensign or other publication in which he claimed to be a hero in a war event. A nonmember who was actually in the same war event read the story and contacted the Church about the falsehoods located within the article/publication. This led to an investigation and eventual confession that Paul had exaggerated his stories about what he had really done. Somewhere in 1991-2 he was disfellowshipped. I believe hs is now in full fellowship. Immediately after his disfellowship status was announced to the Church, members began throwing away his books and talk tapes!
I don't remember him being disfellowshipped, but then we lived far from Utah at the time. I think he is still referred to as an "emeritus" member of the Seventy, which means that he just retired from active work within that body.
But I could easily be wrong on both counts.
You are certainly right, though, in the fact that when he "fell from grace" the majority of the members really turned on him. It didn't make much difference to me, as I never really liked his writing. I always felt it was shallow and exploitive, even when I was a teen.
QUOTE |
Thanks for the info. What exactly did he plead 'no-contest' too? |